reviewThe American Journal of GastroenterologyMay 13, 2008Closed access

Cochrane Systematic Review of Colorectal Cancer Screening Using the Fecal Occult Blood Test (Hemoccult): An Update

University of Oxford · Primary Health Care · +3 more institutions

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

Methods

We searched eight electronic databases (Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsychINFO, AMED, SIGLE, and HMIC). We identified nine articles describing four randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving over 320,000 participants with follow-up ranging from 8 to 18 yr. The primary analyses used intention to screen and a secondary analysis adjusted for nonattendance. We calculated the relative risks and risk differences for each trial, and then overall, using fixed and random effects models.

Results

Combined results from the four eligible RCTs indicated that screening had a 16% reduction in the relative risk (RR) of CRC mortality (RR 0.84, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.78-0.90). There was a 15% RR reduction (RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.78-0.92) in CRC mortality for studies that used biennial screening. When adjusted for screening attendance in the individual studies, there was a 25% RR reduction (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.66-0.84) for those attending at least one round of screening using the FOBT. There was no difference in all-cause mortality (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.99-1.02) or all-cause mortality excluding CRC (RR 1.01, 95% CI 1.00-1.03).

Citation impact

999
total citations
FWCI
20.45
Percentile
100%
References
53
Citations per year

Authors

5

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Medicine
  • Relative risk
  • Cochrane Library
  • Colorectal cancer
  • Meta-analysis
  • Internal medicine
  • Confidence interval
  • Randomized controlled trial
UN Sustainable Development Goals
  • Good health and well-being
No related works found for this paper.