articleJournal of Clinical OncologyNov 5, 2013Closed access

Randomized, Open-Label, Phase III Study Comparing Irinotecan With Paclitaxel in Patients With Advanced Gastric Cancer Without Severe Peritoneal Metastasis After Failure of Prior Combination Chemotherapy Using Fluoropyrimidine Plus Platinum: WJOG 4007 Trial

Shikoku Cancer Center · Tohoku University · +2 more institutions

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

Results

Of 223 patients, 219 were eligible for analysis. Median OS was 9.5 months in 108 patients allocated to the paclitaxel group and 8.4 months in 111 patients allocated to the irinotecan group (hazard ratio [HR], 1.13; 95% CI, 0.86 to 1.49; P = .38). Median PFS was 3.6 months in the paclitaxel group and 2.3 months in the irinotecan group (HR, 1.14; 95% CI, 0.88 to 1.49; P = .33). Response rate was 20.9% in the paclitaxel group and 13.6% in the irinotecan group (P = .24). Common grade 3 to 4 adverse events were neutropenia (paclitaxel group, 28.7%; irinotecan group, 39.1%), anemia (21.3%; 30.0%), and anorexia (7.4%; 17.3%). Treatment-related deaths occurred in two patients (1.8%) in the irinotecan group. Third-line chemotherapy was administered in 97 patients (89.8%) after paclitaxel treatment and in 80 patients (72.1%) after irinotecan treatment (P = .001).

Conclusion

No statistically significant difference was observed between paclitaxel and irinotecan for OS. Both are reasonable second-line treatment options for advanced gastric cancer.

Citation impact

558
total citations
FWCI
26.40
Percentile
100%
References
24
Citations per year

Authors

20

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Medicine
  • Irinotecan
  • Internal medicine
  • Paclitaxel
  • Neutropenia
  • Chemotherapy
  • Hazard ratio
  • Clinical endpoint
UN Sustainable Development Goals
  • Good health and well-being
No related works found for this paper.