articleJan 1, 2003Closed access
MAPS OF BOUNDED RATIONALITY: A PERSPECTIVE ON INTUITIVE JUDGMENT AND CHOICE
Abstract
The work cited by the Nobel committee was done jointly with the late Amos Tversky (1937‐1996) during a long and unusually close collaboration. Together, we explored the psychology of intuitive beliefs and choices and examined their bounded rationality. This essay presents a current perspective on the three major topics of our joint work: heuristics of judgment, risky choice, and framing effects. In all three domains we studied intuitions ‐ thoughts and preferences that come to mind quickly and without much reflection. I review the older research and some recent developments in light of two ideas that have become central to social-cognitive psychology in the intervening decades: the notion that thoughts differ…
Citation impact
867
total citations
- FWCI
- 8.84
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 120
Citations per year
Authors
1Topics & keywords
Topics
Keywords
- Heuristics
- Bounded rationality
- Framing (construction)
- Epistemology
- Psychology
- Salience (neuroscience)
- Cognition
- Perspective (graphical)
No related works found for this paper.