articleJan 1, 2003Closed access

MAPS OF BOUNDED RATIONALITY: A PERSPECTIVE ON INTUITIVE JUDGMENT AND CHOICE

Abstract

The work cited by the Nobel committee was done jointly with the late Amos Tversky (1937‐1996) during a long and unusually close collaboration. Together, we explored the psychology of intuitive beliefs and choices and examined their bounded rationality. This essay presents a current perspective on the three major topics of our joint work: heuristics of judgment, risky choice, and framing effects. In all three domains we studied intuitions ‐ thoughts and preferences that come to mind quickly and without much reflection. I review the older research and some recent developments in light of two ideas that have become central to social-cognitive psychology in the intervening decades: the notion that thoughts differ…

Citation impact

867
total citations
FWCI
8.84
Percentile
100%
References
120
Citations per year

Authors

1

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Heuristics
  • Bounded rationality
  • Framing (construction)
  • Epistemology
  • Psychology
  • Salience (neuroscience)
  • Cognition
  • Perspective (graphical)
No related works found for this paper.