articleIEEE Transactions on Software EngineeringAug 28, 2013Closed access

Data Quality: Some Comments on the NASA Software Defect Datasets

Brunel University of London · Xi'an Jiaotong University · +1 more institution

Indexed incrossref

Abstract

Background--Self-evidently empirical analyses rely upon the quality of their data. Likewise, replications rely upon accurate reporting and using the same rather than similar versions of datasets. In recent years, there has been much interest in using machine learners to classify software modules into defect-prone and not defect-prone categories. The publicly available NASA datasets have been extensively used as part of this research. Objective--This short note investigates the extent to which published analyses based on the NASA defect datasets are meaningful and comparable. Method--We analyze the five studies published in the IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering since 2007 that have utilized these…

Citation impact

558
total citations
FWCI
72.73
Percentile
100%
References
25
Citations per year

Authors

4

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Computer science
  • Preprocessor
  • Replication (statistics)
  • Software
  • Data pre-processing
  • Data mining
  • Quality (philosophy)
  • Software quality
No related works found for this paper.