articleAmerican Journal of EpidemiologyJun 24, 2007Closed access

The Impact of Residual and Unmeasured Confounding in Epidemiologic Studies: A Simulation Study

University of Bristol

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

Measurement error in explanatory variables and unmeasured confounders can cause considerable problems in epidemiologic studies. It is well recognized that under certain conditions, nondifferential measurement error in the exposure variable produces bias towards the null. Measurement error in confounders will lead to residual confounding, but this is not a straightforward issue, and it is not clear in which direction the bias will point. Unmeasured confounders further complicate matters. There has been discussion about the amount of bias in exposure effect estimates that can plausibly occur due to residual or unmeasured confounding. In this paper, the authors use simulation studies and logistic regression…

Citation impact

757
total citations
FWCI
14.56
Percentile
100%
References
40
Citations per year

Authors

3

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Confounding
  • Residual
  • Observational study
  • Statistics
  • Observational error
  • Econometrics
  • Logistic regression
  • Uncorrelated
UN Sustainable Development Goals
  • Good health and well-being
No related works found for this paper.

Funding