Randomized, Phase III Trial of Panitumumab With Infusional Fluorouracil, Leucovorin, and Oxaliplatin (FOLFOX4) Versus FOLFOX4 Alone As First-Line Treatment in Patients With Previously Untreated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: The PRIME Study
Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital
Abstract
KRAS results were available for 93% of the 1,183 patients randomly assigned. In the wild-type (WT) KRAS stratum, panitumumab-FOLFOX4 significantly improved PFS compared with FOLFOX4 (median PFS, 9.6 v 8.0 months, respectively; hazard ratio [HR], 0.80; 95% CI, 0.66 to 0.97; P = .02). A nonsignificant increase in OS was also observed for panitumumab-FOLFOX4 versus FOLFOX4 (median OS, 23.9 v 19.7 months, respectively; HR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.67 to 1.02; P = .072). In the mutant KRAS stratum, PFS was significantly reduced in the panitumumab-FOLFOX4 arm versus the FOLFOX4 arm (HR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.04 to 1.62; P = .02), and median OS was 15.5 months versus 19.3 months, respectively (HR, 1.24; 95% CI, 0.98 to 1.57; P = .068). Adverse event rates were generally comparable across arms with the exception of toxicities known to be associated with anti-EGFR therapy.
This study demonstrated that panitumumab-FOLFOX4 was well tolerated and significantly improved PFS in patients with WT KRAS tumors and underscores the importance of KRAS testing for patients with mCRC.
Citation impact
- FWCI
- 73.82
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 27
Authors
20- JDJean‐Yves DouillardCorresponding
Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital
- SSSalvatore Siena
Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital
- JTJames T. Cassidy
Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital
- JTJosep Tabernero
Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital
- RLRonald L. Burkes
Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital
Topics & keywords
- Panitumumab
- Oxaliplatin
- Medicine
- KRAS
- Internal medicine
- Colorectal cancer
- Clinical endpoint
- Hazard ratio
- Good health and well-being