articleChoice Reviews OnlineMay 1, 2002Closed access

Sperm competition and its evolutionary consequences in the insects

SLSimmons, Leigh W.
Indexed incrossref

Abstract

Ashot on goal does not ensure victory*.Likewise, insemination does not guaranteepaternity. When females store sperm fromseveral males, each male’s fitness dependson his ability to tilt the ensuing fertilizationcontest (sperm competition) in his favour.How males achieve this goal was the mainfocus of study for 30 years. Recently,however, there have been more questionsabout how females influence spermcompetition (cryptic female choice). Toanswer them, we need to know why femalesmate multiply. What are the fitness benefitsand consequent selection on femalemorphology, physiology and behaviour? In spite of the newfound popularity ofcryptic female choice, driven largely byBillEberhard’s book [1] and more recentwork…

Citation impact

1,328
total citations
FWCI
117.96
Percentile
100%
References
4
Citations per year

Authors

1
  • SL
    Simmons, Leigh W.Corresponding

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Sperm competition
  • Competition (biology)
  • Biology
  • Sperm
  • Evolutionary biology
  • Zoology
  • Ecology
  • Botany
UN Sustainable Development Goals
  • Gender equality
No related works found for this paper.