articleJul 25, 2010Closed access

Quality management on Amazon Mechanical Turk

New York University

Indexed incrossref

Abstract

Crowdsourcing services, such as Amazon Mechanical Turk, allow for easy distribution of small tasks to a large number of workers. Unfortunately, since manually verifying the quality of the submitted results is hard, malicious workers often take advantage of the verification difficulty and submit answers of low quality. Currently, most requesters rely on redundancy to identify the correct answers. However, redundancy is not a panacea. Massive redundancy is expensive, increasing significantly the cost of crowdsourced solutions. Therefore, we need techniques that will accurately estimate the quality of the workers, allowing for the rejection and blocking of the low-performing workers and spammers.

Citation impact

986
total citations
FWCI
135.41
Percentile
100%
References
3
Citations per year

Authors

3

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Redundancy (engineering)
  • Crowdsourcing
  • Computer science
  • Panacea (medicine)
  • Amazon rainforest
  • Quality (philosophy)
  • Data science
  • Computer security
UN Sustainable Development Goals
  • Decent work and economic growth
No related works found for this paper.

Funding