articleThe OncologistFeb 26, 2013BRONZE OA

The Financial Toxicity of Cancer Treatment: A Pilot Study Assessing Out-of-Pocket Expenses and the Insured Cancer Patient's Experience

Durham University · Clinical Research Institute · +4 more institutions

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefdoajpubmed

Abstract

Methods

We conducted baseline and follow-up surveys regarding the impact of health care costs on well-being and treatment among cancer patients who contacted a national copayment assistance foundation along with a comparison sample of patients treated at an academic medical center.

Results

Among 254 participants, 75% applied for drug copayment assistance. Forty-two percent of participants reported a significant or catastrophic subjective financial burden; 68% cut back on leisure activities, 46% reduced spending on food and clothing, and 46% used savings to defray out-of-pocket expenses. To save money, 20% took less than the prescribed amount of medication, 19% partially filled prescriptions, and 24% avoided filling prescriptions altogether. Copayment assistance applicants were more likely than nonapplicants to employ at least one of these strategies to defray costs (98% vs. 78%). In an adjusted analysis, younger age, larger household size, applying for copayment assistance, and communicating with physicians about costs were associated with greater subjective financial burden.

Citation impact

1,097
total citations
FWCI
197.82
Percentile
100%
References
22
Citations per year

Authors

7

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Copayment
  • Underinsured
  • Medicine
  • Cost sharing
  • Medical prescription
  • Health care
  • Family medicine
  • Cancer
UN Sustainable Development Goals
  • Decent work and economic growth
No related works found for this paper.

Funding