US or CT for Diagnosis of Appendicitis in Children and Adults? A Meta-Analysis
Hospital for Sick Children · SickKids Foundation · +3 more institutions
Abstract
Medical literature (from 1986 to 2004) was searched for articles on studies that used US, CT, or both as diagnostic tests for appendicitis in children (26 studies, 9356 patients) or adults (31 studies, 4341 patients). Prospective and retrospective studies were included if they separately reported the rate of true-positive, true-negative, false-positive, and false-negative diagnoses of appendicitis from US and CT findings compared with the positive and negative rates of appendicitis at surgery or follow-up. Clinical variables, technical factors, and test performance were extracted. Three readers assessed the quality of studies.
Pooled sensitivity and specificity for diagnosis of appendicitis in children were 88% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 86%, 90%) and 94% (95% CI: 92%, 95%), respectively, for US studies and 94% (95% CI: 92%, 97%) and 95% (95% CI: 94%, 97%), respectively, for CT studies. Pooled sensitivity and specificity for diagnosis in adults were 83% (95% CI: 78%, 87%) and 93% (95% CI: 90%, 96%), respectively, for US studies and 94% (95% CI: 92%, 95%) and 94% (95% CI: 94%, 96%), respectively, for CT studies.
Citation impact
- FWCI
- 26.55
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 102
Authors
8- ASAndréa S. DoriaCorresponding
Hospital for Sick Children, SickKids Foundation
- RMRahim Moineddin
University of Toronto
- CJChristian J. Kellenberger
Hospital for Sick Children
- MEMónica Epelman
Hospital for Sick Children
- JBJoseph Beyene
Hospital for Sick Children, Great Ormond Street Hospital, University College London, SickKids Foundation
Topics & keywords
- Medicine
- Appendicitis
- Confidence interval
- Meta-analysis
- Medical diagnosis
- Radiology
- Diagnostic accuracy
- Prospective cohort study
- Quality Education