Randomized Trial of Dose-Dense Versus Conventionally Scheduled and Sequential Versus Concurrent Combination Chemotherapy as Postoperative Adjuvant Treatment of Node-Positive Primary Breast Cancer: First Report of Intergroup Trial C9741/Cancer and Leukemia Group B Trial 9741
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Abstract
A protocol-specified analysis was performed at a median follow-up of 36 months: 315 patients had experienced relapse or died, compared with 515 expected treatment failures. Dose-dense treatment improved the primary end point, DFS (risk ratio [RR] = 0.74; P =.010), and OS (RR = 0.69; P =.013). Four-year DFS was 82% for the dose-dense regimens and 75% for the others. There was no difference in either DFS or OS between the concurrent and sequential schedules. There was no interaction between density and sequence. Severe neutropenia was less frequent in patients who received the dose-dense regimens.
Dose density improves clinical outcomes significantly, despite the lower than expected number of events at this time. Sequential chemotherapy is as effective as concurrent chemotherapy.
Citation impact
- FWCI
- 52.99
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 21
Authors
21- MLMarc L. CitronCorresponding
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
- DADonald A. Berry
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
- CCConstance Cirrincione
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
- CAClifford A. Hudis
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
- EPEric P. Winer
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Topics & keywords
- Medicine
- Breast cancer
- Cyclophosphamide
- Chemotherapy
- Neutropenia
- Internal medicine
- Filgrastim
- Clinical endpoint
- Good health and well-being