Bulimia nervosa treatment: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · RTI International
Abstract
The RTI International-University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Evidence-based Practice Center (RTI-UNC EPC) systematically reviewed evidence on efficacy of treatment for anorexia nervosa (AN), harms associated with treatments, factors associated with treatment efficacy, and differential outcome by sociodemographic characteristics. METHOD: We searched six major databases for studies on the treatment of AN from 1980 to September 2005, in all languages against a priori inclusion/exclusion criteria focusing on eating, psychiatric or psychological, or biomarker outcomes.
Thirty-two treatment studies involved only medications, only behavioral interventions, and medication plus behavioral interventions for adults or adolescents. The literature on medication treatments and behavioral treatments for adults with AN is sparse and inconclusive. Cognitive behavioral therapy may reduce relapse risk for adults with AN after weight restoration, although its efficacy in the underweight state remains unknown. Variants of family therapy are efficacious in adolescents, but not in adults.
Citation impact
- FWCI
- 42.84
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 112
Authors
6Topics & keywords
- Bulimia nervosa
- Psychological intervention
- Psychology
- Clinical psychology
- Psychiatry
- Binge eating
- Cognitive behavioral therapy
- Randomized controlled trial
- Reduced inequalities