articleNew England Journal of MedicineFeb 14, 2007BRONZE OA

Live Attenuated versus Inactivated Influenza Vaccine in Infants and Young Children

Saint Louis University · Saint Louis University · +5 more institutions

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

Background

Universal vaccination of children 6 to 59 months of age with trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine has recently been recommended by U.S. advisory bodies. To evaluate alternative vaccine approaches, we compared the safety and efficacy of intranasally administered live attenuated influenza vaccine with those of inactivated vaccine in infants and young children.

Methods

Children 6 to 59 months of age, without a recent episode of wheezing illness or severe asthma, were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either cold-adapted trivalent live attenuated influenza vaccine (a refrigeration-stable formulation of live attenuated intranasally administered influenza vaccine) or trivalent inactivated vaccine in a double-blind manner. Influenza-like illness was monitored with cultures throughout the 2004-2005 influenza season.

Citation impact

810
total citations
FWCI
39.63
Percentile
100%
References
15
Citations per year

Authors

8

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Medicine
  • Live attenuated influenza vaccine
  • Attenuated vaccine
  • Influenza vaccine
  • Virology
  • Vaccination
  • Young adult
  • Pediatrics
UN Sustainable Development Goals
  • Good health and well-being
No related works found for this paper.