Reliability of the PEDro Scale for Rating Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials
The University of Sydney · UNSW Sydney · +2 more institutions
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Assessment of the quality of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) is common practice in systematic reviews. However, the reliability of data obtained with most quality assessment scales has not been established. This report describes 2 studies designed to investigate the reliability of data obtained with the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale developed to rate the quality of RCTs evaluating physical therapist interventions. METHOD: In the first study, 11 raters independently rated 25 RCTs randomly selected from the PEDro database. In the second study, 2 raters rated 120 RCTs randomly selected from the PEDro database, and disagreements were resolved by a third rater; this…
Citation impact
- FWCI
- 32.34
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 35
Authors
5Topics & keywords
- Intraclass correlation
- Reliability (semiconductor)
- Kappa
- Confidence interval
- Randomized controlled trial
- Psychology
- Inter-rater reliability
- Rating scale