Influence of Nonfatal Hospitalization for Heart Failure on Subsequent Mortality in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure
University of London · Cleveland Clinic · +7 more institutions
Abstract
Patients with chronic heart failure (HF) are at increased risk of both fatal and nonfatal major adverse cardiovascular events. We used data from the Candesartan in Heart failure: Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity (CHARM) trials to assess the influence of nonfatal hospitalizations for HF on subsequent mortality rates in a broad spectrum of HF patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: In the present study, 7599 patients with New York Heart Association class II to IV HF and reduced or preserved left ventricular ejection fraction were randomized to placebo or candesartan. We assessed the risk of death after discharge from a first hospitalization for HF using time-updated Cox proportional-hazards models on 7572 patients for whom discharge data were available. Of 7572 patients, 1455 (19%) had at least 1 HF hospitalization, and 586 of 1819 deaths occurred after discharge from an HF hospitalization. The mortality rate was increased after HF hospitalizations, even after adjustment for baseline predictors of death (hazard ratio, 3.15; 95% confidence interval, 2.83 to 3.50). Longer duration of HF hospitalization enhanced the risk of dying, as did repeat HF hospitalizations. Moreover, risk of death was highest within a month of discharge and then declined progressively over time, particularly for death resulting from HF progression and for sudden cardiac death. We observed a similar pattern of risk associated with all-cause hospitalization, although the magnitude was less than that with HF hospitalization.
In patients with chronic HF, the risk of death is greatest in the early period after discharge after a hospitalization for HF and is directly related to the duration and frequency of HF hospitalizations. These findings suggest a role for increased surveillance in the early postdischarge period of greatest vulnerability after an HF admission.
Citation impact
- FWCI
- 15.41
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 21
Authors
11- SDScott D. SolomonCorresponding
University of London, Cleveland Clinic, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Duke Medical Center, AstraZeneca (United States), Hamilton Health Sciences, University of Glasgow, McMaster University
- JDJoanna Dobson
University of London, Cleveland Clinic, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Duke Medical Center, AstraZeneca (United States), Hamilton Health Sciences, University of Glasgow, McMaster University
- SPStuart Pocock
University of London, Cleveland Clinic, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Duke Medical Center, AstraZeneca (United States), Hamilton Health Sciences, University of Glasgow, McMaster University
- HSHicham Skali
University of London, Cleveland Clinic, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Duke Medical Center, AstraZeneca (United States), Hamilton Health Sciences, University of Glasgow, McMaster University
- JJJohn J.V. McMurray
University of London, Cleveland Clinic, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Duke Medical Center, AstraZeneca (United States), Hamilton Health Sciences, University of Glasgow, McMaster University
Topics & keywords
- Medicine
- Heart failure
- Hazard ratio
- Ejection fraction
- Internal medicine
- Cardiology
- Proportional hazards model
- Candesartan
- Good health and well-being