articleThe Journal of PoliticsApr 29, 2007Closed access

Growth and Governance: Models, Measures, and Mechanisms

The Ohio State University

Indexed incrossref

Abstract

The regnant scholarly consensus linking good governance—the quality of public administration—to economic development has undergone surprisingly little empirical scrutiny. We examine the relationship by asking two questions: How confident are we in our cross-national measures of good governance? How solid are the empirical foundations of the growth-governance causal linkage? Our results suggest that the dominant measures of governance are problematic, suffering from perceptual biases, adverse selection in sampling, and conceptual conflation with economic policy choices. Within the limits of somewhat problematic measures, the evidence suggests that there is far more reason to believe that growth and development…

Citation impact

660
total citations
FWCI
70.95
Percentile
100%
References
66
Citations per year

Authors

2

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Conflation
  • Corporate governance
  • Scrutiny
  • Political science
  • Linkage (software)
  • Positive economics
  • Quality (philosophy)
  • Empirical evidence
No related works found for this paper.