Meta-Analysis of Concomitant Versus Sequential Radiochemotherapy in Locally Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer
Université de Montpellier · Institut Gustave Roussy
Abstract
Systematic searches for trials were undertaken, followed by central collection, checking, and reanalysis of updated individual patient data. Results from trials were combined using the stratified log-rank test to calculate pooled hazard ratios (HRs). The primary outcome was overall survival; secondary outcomes were progression-free survival, cumulative incidences of locoregional and distant progression, and acute toxicity.
Of seven eligible trials, data from six trials were received (1,205 patients, 92% of all randomly assigned patients). Median follow-up was 6 years. There was a significant benefit of concomitant radiochemotherapy on overall survival (HR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.74 to 0.95; P = .004), with an absolute benefit of 5.7% (from 18.1% to 23.8%) at 3 years and 4.5% at 5 years. For progression-free survival, the HR was 0.90 (95% CI, 0.79 to 1.01; P = .07). Concomitant treatment decreased locoregional progression (HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.62 to 0.95; P = .01); its effect was not different from that of sequential treatment on distant progression (HR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.86 to 1.25; P = .69). Concomitant radiochemotherapy increased acute esophageal toxicity (grade 3-4) from 4% to 18% with a relative risk of 4.9 (95% CI, 3.1 to 7.8; P
Citation impact
- FWCI
- 61.70
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 41
Authors
18- AAAnne AupérinCorresponding
Université de Montpellier, Institut Gustave Roussy
- CLC. Le Péchoux
Université de Montpellier, Institut Gustave Roussy
- EREstelle Rolland
Université de Montpellier, Institut Gustave Roussy
- WJWalter J. Curran
Université de Montpellier, Institut Gustave Roussy
- KFKiyoyuki Furuse
Université de Montpellier, Institut Gustave Roussy
Topics & keywords
- Concomitant
- Medicine
- Internal medicine
- Hazard ratio
- Lung cancer
- Oncology
- Randomized controlled trial
- Chemotherapy
- Good health and well-being