articleNew England Journal of MedicineApr 4, 2011BRONZE OA

Randomized Trial of Stents versus Bypass Surgery for Left Main Coronary Artery Disease

Ulsan College · Asan Medical Center · +12 more institutions

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

Background

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is increasingly used to treat unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis, although coronary-artery bypass grafting (CABG) has been considered to be the treatment of choice.

Methods

We randomly assigned patients with unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis to undergo CABG (300 patients) or PCI with sirolimus-eluting stents (300 patients). Using a wide margin for noninferiority, we compared the groups with respect to the primary composite end point of major adverse cardiac or cerebrovascular events (death from any cause, myocardial infarction, stroke, or ischemia-driven target-vessel revascularization) at 1 year. Event rates at 2 years were also compared between the two groups.

Citation impact

682
total citations
FWCI
75.57
Percentile
100%
References
34
Citations per year

Authors

24

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Medicine
  • Conventional PCI
  • Percutaneous coronary intervention
  • Cardiology
  • Hazard ratio
  • Myocardial infarction
  • Internal medicine
  • Revascularization
UN Sustainable Development Goals
  • Good health and well-being
No related works found for this paper.