Randomized Trial of Stents versus Bypass Surgery for Left Main Coronary Artery Disease
Ulsan College · Asan Medical Center · +12 more institutions
Abstract
Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is increasingly used to treat unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis, although coronary-artery bypass grafting (CABG) has been considered to be the treatment of choice.
We randomly assigned patients with unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis to undergo CABG (300 patients) or PCI with sirolimus-eluting stents (300 patients). Using a wide margin for noninferiority, we compared the groups with respect to the primary composite end point of major adverse cardiac or cerebrovascular events (death from any cause, myocardial infarction, stroke, or ischemia-driven target-vessel revascularization) at 1 year. Event rates at 2 years were also compared between the two groups.
Citation impact
- FWCI
- 75.57
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 34
Authors
24- SPSeung‐Jung ParkCorresponding
Ulsan College, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan
- YKYoung‐Hak Kim
Ulsan College, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan
- DPDuk‐Woo Park
Ulsan College, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan
- SYSung‐Cheol Yun
Ulsan College, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan
- JAJung‐Min Ahn
Ulsan College, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan
Topics & keywords
- Medicine
- Conventional PCI
- Percutaneous coronary intervention
- Cardiology
- Hazard ratio
- Myocardial infarction
- Internal medicine
- Revascularization
- Good health and well-being