articleJournal of Personality and Social PsychologyJan 1, 2011Closed access

The moral emotions: A social–functionalist account of anger, disgust, and contempt.

Stanford University

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

Recent research has highlighted the important role of emotion in moral judgment and decision making (Greene, Sommerville, Nystrom, Darley, & Cohen, 2001; Haidt, 2001). What is less clear is whether distinctions should be drawn among specific moral emotions. Although some have argued for differences among anger, disgust, and contempt (Rozin, Lowery, Imada, & Haidt, 1999), others have suggested that these terms may describe a single undifferentiated emotional response to morally offensive behavior (Nabi, 2002). In this article, we take a social-functionalist perspective, which makes the prediction that these emotions should be differentiable both in antecedent appraisals and in consequent actions and judgments.…

Citation impact

596
total citations
FWCI
12.35
Percentile
100%
References
61
Citations per year

Authors

2

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Contempt
  • Psychology
  • Disgust
  • Anger
  • Social psychology
  • Appraisal theory
  • Antecedent (behavioral psychology)
  • Cognitive psychology
UN Sustainable Development Goals
  • Peace, Justice and strong institutions
No related works found for this paper.