reviewInternational Journal of Medical InformaticsJan 19, 2014HYBRID OA

Factors influencing acceptance of technology for aging in place: A systematic review

Tilburg University · Fontys University of Applied Sciences · +3 more institutions

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

Methods

A systematic review of mixed studies. Seven major scientific databases (including MEDLINE, Scopus and CINAHL) were searched. Inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) original and peer-reviewed research, (2) qualitative, quantitative or mixed methods research, (3) research in which participants are community-dwelling older adults aged 60 years or older, and (4) research aimed at investigating factors that influence the intention to use or the actual use of electronic technology for aging in place. Three researchers each read the articles and extracted factors.

Results

Sixteen out of 2841 articles were included. Most articles investigated acceptance of technology that enhances safety or provides social interaction. The majority of data was based on qualitative research investigating factors in the pre-implementation stage. Acceptance in this stage is influenced by 27 factors, divided into six themes: concerns regarding technology (e.g., high cost, privacy implications and usability factors); expected benefits of technology (e.g., increased safety and perceived usefulness); need for technology (e.g., perceived need and subjective health status); alternatives to technology (e.g., help by family or spouse), social influence (e.g., influence of family, friends and professional caregivers); and characteristics of older adults (e.g., desire to age in place). When comparing these results to qualitative results on post-implementation acceptance, our analysis showed that some factors are persistent while new factors also emerge. Quantitative results showed that a small number of variables have a significant influence in the pre-implementation stage. Fourteen out of the sixteen included articles did not use an existing technology acceptance framework or model.

Citation impact

1,154
total citations
FWCI
191.50
Percentile
100%
References
73
Citations per year

Authors

6

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • CINAHL
  • Usability
  • Spouse
  • Qualitative research
  • Scopus
  • Aging in place
  • Technology acceptance model
  • Psychology
UN Sustainable Development Goals
  • Reduced inequalities
No related works found for this paper.

Funding