articleJournal of Personality and Social PsychologyMar 8, 2011Closed access

Evidence that gendered wording in job advertisements exists and sustains gender inequality.

University of Waterloo · Duke University

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

Social dominance theory (Sidanius & Pratto, 1999) contends that institutional-level mechanisms exist that reinforce and perpetuate existing group-based inequalities, but very few such mechanisms have been empirically demonstrated. We propose that gendered wording (i.e., masculine- and feminine-themed words, such as those associated with gender stereotypes) may be a heretofore unacknowledged, institutional-level mechanism of inequality maintenance. Employing both archival and experimental analyses, the present research demonstrates that gendered wording commonly employed in job recruitment materials can maintain gender inequality in traditionally male-dominated occupations. Studies 1 and 2 demonstrated the…

Citation impact

663
total citations
FWCI
23.34
Percentile
100%
References
84
Citations per year

Authors

3

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Psychology
  • Social psychology
  • Belongingness
  • Inequality
  • Perception
  • Dominance (genetics)
  • Set (abstract data type)
  • Masculinity
No related works found for this paper.

Funding