Replication levels, false presences and the estimation of the presence/absence from eDNA metabarcoding data
Laboratoire d'Écologie Alpine · Université Grenoble Alpes
Abstract
Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding is increasingly used to study the present and past biodiversity. eDNA analyses often rely on amplification of very small quantities or degraded DNA. To avoid missing detection of taxa that are actually present (false negatives), multiple extractions and amplifications of the same samples are often performed. However, the level of replication needed for reliable estimates of the presence/absence patterns remains an unaddressed topic. Furthermore, degraded DNA and PCR/sequencing errors might produce false positives. We used simulations and empirical data to evaluate the level of replication required for accurate detection of targeted taxa in different contexts and to assess…
Citation impact
- FWCI
- 34.07
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 54
Authors
12- GFGentile Francesco FicetolaCorresponding
Laboratoire d'Écologie Alpine, Université Grenoble Alpes
- JPJohan Pansu
Laboratoire d'Écologie Alpine, Université Grenoble Alpes
- ABAurélie Bonin
Laboratoire d'Écologie Alpine, Université Grenoble Alpes
- ÉCÉric Coissac
Laboratoire d'Écologie Alpine, Université Grenoble Alpes
- CGCharline Giguet‐Covex
Laboratoire d'Écologie Alpine, Université Grenoble Alpes
Topics & keywords
- False positive paradox
- Replication (statistics)
- Biology
- Reliability (semiconductor)
- Statistics
- Statistical power
- Environmental DNA
- Computational biology
- Life in Land