A Re-Evaluation of Random-Effects Meta-Analysis

Medical Research Council

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

Meta-analysis in the presence of unexplained heterogeneity is frequently undertaken by using a random-effects model, in which the effects underlying different studies are assumed to be drawn from a normal distribution. Here we discuss the justification and interpretation of such models, by addressing in turn the aims of estimation, prediction and hypothesis testing. A particular issue that we consider is the distinction between inference on the mean of the random-effects distribution and inference on the whole distribution. We suggest that random-effects meta-analyses as currently conducted often fail to provide the key results, and we investigate the extent to which distribution-free, classical and Bayesian…

Citation impact

2,488
total citations
FWCI
47.53
Percentile
100%
References
100
Citations per year

Authors

3

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Bayesian probability
  • Inference
  • Random effects model
  • Meta-analysis
  • Computer science
  • A priori and a posteriori
  • Bayesian inference
  • Econometrics
No related works found for this paper.

Funding