articleThe Lancet OncologyMar 12, 2009HYBRID OA

Sensitivity and specificity of multimodal and ultrasound screening for ovarian cancer, and stage distribution of detected cancers: results of the prevalence screen of the UK Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening (UKCTOCS)

University College London · Queen Elizabeth Hospital · +25 more institutions

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

Background

Ovarian cancer has a high case-fatality ratio, with most women not diagnosed until the disease is in its advanced stages. The United Kingdom Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening (UKCTOCS) is a randomised controlled trial designed to assess the effect of screening on mortality. This report summarises the outcome of the prevalence (initial) screen in UKCTOCS.

Methods

Between 2001 and 2005, a total of 202 638 post-menopausal women aged 50-74 years were randomly assigned to no treatment (control; n=101 359); annual CA125 screening (interpreted using a risk of ovarian cancer algorithm) with transvaginal ultrasound scan as a second-line test (multimodal screening [MMS]; n=50 640); or annual screening with transvaginal ultrasound (USS; n=50 639) alone in a 2:1:1 ratio using a computer-generated random number algorithm. All women provided a blood sample at recruitment. Women randomised to the MMS group had their blood tested for CA125 and those randomised to the USS group were sent an appointment to attend for a transvaginal scan. Women with abnormal screens had repeat tests. Women with persistent abnormality on repeat screens underwent clinical evaluation and, where appropriate, surgery. This trial is registered as ISRCTN22488978 and with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00058032.

Citation impact

832
total citations
FWCI
91.33
Percentile
100%
References
36
Citations per year

Authors

31

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Medicine
  • Ovarian cancer
  • Cancer
  • Gynecology
  • Randomized controlled trial
  • Stage (stratigraphy)
  • Clinical trial
  • Internal medicine
UN Sustainable Development Goals
  • Good health and well-being
No related works found for this paper.

Funding