articleNew England Journal of MedicineDec 9, 2004Closed access

Prophylactic Use of an Implantable Cardioverter–Defibrillator after Acute Myocardial Infarction

Goethe University Frankfurt · Asklepios Klinik St. Georg · +2 more institutions

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

Background

Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy has been shown to improve survival in patients with various heart conditions who are at high risk for ventricular arrhythmias. Whether benefit occurs in patients early after myocardial infarction is unknown.

Methods

We conducted the Defibrillator in Acute Myocardial Infarction Trial, a randomized, open-label comparison of ICD therapy (in 332 patients) and no ICD therapy (in 342 patients) 6 to 40 days after a myocardial infarction. We enrolled patients who had reduced left ventricular function (left ventricular ejection fraction, 0.35 or less) and impaired cardiac autonomic function (manifested as depressed heart-rate variability or an elevated average 24-hour heart rate on Holter monitoring). The primary outcome was mortality from any cause. Death from arrhythmia was a predefined secondary outcome.

Citation impact

1,517
total citations
FWCI
47.01
Percentile
100%
References
22
Citations per year

Authors

9

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Medicine
  • Myocardial infarction
  • Hazard ratio
  • Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator
  • Internal medicine
  • Cardiology
  • Ejection fraction
  • Confidence interval
UN Sustainable Development Goals
  • Good health and well-being
No related works found for this paper.