articleThe LancetOct 14, 2014HYBRID OA

Long-term outcomes after stenting versus endarterectomy for treatment of symptomatic carotid stenosis: the International Carotid Stenting Study (ICSS) randomised trial

University of Basel · University Hospital of Basel · +8 more institutions

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

Background

Stenting is an alternative to endarterectomy for treatment of carotid artery stenosis, but long-term efficacy is uncertain. We report long-term data from the randomised International Carotid Stenting Study comparison of these treatments.

Methods

Patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis were randomly assigned 1:1 to open treatment with stenting or endarterectomy at 50 centres worldwide. Randomisation was computer generated centrally and allocated by telephone call or fax. Major outcomes were assessed by an independent endpoint committee unaware of treatment assignment. The primary endpoint was fatal or disabling stroke in any territory after randomisation to the end of follow-up. Analysis was by intention to treat ([ITT] all patients) and per protocol from 31 days after treatment (all patients in whom assigned treatment was completed). Functional ability was rated with the modified Rankin scale. This study is registered, number ISRCTN25337470.

Citation impact

540
total citations
FWCI
33.93
Percentile
100%
References
30
Citations per year

Authors

14

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Medicine
  • Carotid stenting
  • Carotid endarterectomy
  • Clinical endpoint
  • Modified Rankin Scale
  • Hazard ratio
  • Stroke (engine)
  • Endarterectomy
UN Sustainable Development Goals
  • Good health and well-being
No related works found for this paper.

Funding