Abstract
The two most commonly used penalized model selection criteria, the Bayesian information criterion (BIC) and Akaike’s information criterion (AIC), are examined and compared. Their motivations as approximations of two different target quantities are discussed, and their performance in estimating those quantities is assessed. Despite their different foundations, some similarities between the two statistics can be observed, for example, in analogous interpretations of their penalty terms. The behavior of the criteria in selecting good models for observed data is examined with simulated data and also illustrated with the analysis of two well-known data sets on social mobility. It is argued that useful information…
Citation impact
897
total citations
- FWCI
- 15.41
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 46
Citations per year
Authors
1Topics & keywords
Topics
Keywords
- Akaike information criterion
- Bayesian information criterion
- Model selection
- Information Criteria
- Deviance information criterion
- Selection (genetic algorithm)
- Econometrics
- Statistics
UN Sustainable Development Goals
- Reduced inequalities
No related works found for this paper.