articleJournal of Epidemiology & Community HealthMay 10, 2012BRONZE OA

Using natural experiments to evaluate population health interventions: new Medical Research Council guidance

Scottish Government · Chief Scientist Office · +11 more institutions

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

Natural experimental studies are often recommended as a way of understanding the health impact of policies and other large scale interventions. Although they have certain advantages over planned experiments, and may be the only option when it is impossible to manipulate exposure to the intervention, natural experimental studies are more susceptible to bias. This paper introduces new guidance from the Medical Research Council to help researchers and users, funders and publishers of research evidence make the best use of natural experimental approaches to evaluating population health interventions. The guidance emphasises that natural experiments can provide convincing evidence of impact even when effects are…

Citation impact

933
total citations
FWCI
148.22
Percentile
100%
References
44
Citations per year

Authors

11

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Psychological intervention
  • Natural (archaeology)
  • Intervention (counseling)
  • Natural experiment
  • Process (computing)
  • Population
  • Scale (ratio)
  • Psychology
No related works found for this paper.

Funding