articleNew England Journal of MedicineJan 18, 2006Closed access

Tenofovir DF, Emtricitabine, and Efavirenz vs. Zidovudine, Lamivudine, and Efavirenz for HIV

Johns Hopkins Medicine · Johns Hopkins University · +4 more institutions

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

Background

Durable suppression of replication of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) depends on the use of potent, well-tolerated antiretroviral regimens to which patients can easily adhere.

Methods

We conducted an open-label, noninferiority study involving 517 patients with HIV infection who had not previously received antiretroviral therapy and who were randomly assigned to receive either a regimen of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (DF), emtricitabine, and efavirenz once daily (tenofovir-emtricitabine group) or a regimen of fixed-dose zidovudine and lamivudine twice daily plus efavirenz once daily (zidovudine-lamivudine group). The primary end point was the proportion of patients without baseline resistance to efavirenz in whom the HIV RNA level was less than 400 copies per milliliter at week 48 of the study.

Citation impact

886
total citations
FWCI
50.70
Percentile
100%
References
24
Citations per year

Authors

12

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Emtricitabine
  • Efavirenz
  • Lamivudine
  • Zidovudine
  • Regimen
  • Medicine
  • Reverse-transcriptase inhibitor
  • Internal medicine
No related works found for this paper.