Methodology in conducting a systematic review of systematic reviews of healthcare interventions
Trinity College Dublin · University College Dublin · +3 more institutions
Abstract
Hundreds of studies of maternity care interventions have been published, too many for most people involved in providing maternity care to identify and consider when making decisions. It became apparent that systematic reviews of individual studies were required to appraise, summarise and bring together existing studies in a single place. However, decision makers are increasingly faced by a plethora of such reviews and these are likely to be of variable quality and scope, with more than one review of important topics. Systematic reviews (or overviews) of reviews are a logical and appropriate next step, allowing the findings of separate reviews to be compared and contrasted, providing clinical decision makers with the evidence they need.
The methods used to identify and appraise published and unpublished reviews systematically, drawing on our experiences and good practice in the conduct and reporting of systematic reviews are described. The process of identifying and appraising all published reviews allows researchers to describe the quality of this evidence base, summarise and compare the review's conclusions and discuss the strength of these conclusions.
Citation impact
- FWCI
- 32.56
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 43
Authors
4Topics & keywords
- Systematic review
- Comparability
- Psychological intervention
- Context (archaeology)
- Scope (computer science)
- Health care
- Quality (philosophy)
- Management science
- Reduced inequalities