reviewBritish Journal of Sports MedicineSep 9, 2015HYBRID OA

Monitoring the athlete training response: subjective self-reported measures trump commonly used objective measures: a systematic review

Deakin University

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

Background

Monitoring athlete well-being is essential to guide training and to detect any progression towards negative health outcomes and associated poor performance. Objective (performance, physiological, biochemical) and subjective measures are all options for athlete monitoring.

Objective

We systematically reviewed objective and subjective measures of athlete well-being. Objective measures, including those taken at rest (eg, blood markers, heart rate) and during exercise (eg, oxygen consumption, heart rate response), were compared against subjective measures (eg, mood, perceived stress). All measures were also evaluated for their response to acute and chronic training load.

Citation impact

840
total citations
FWCI
73.07
Percentile
100%
References
124
Citations per year

Authors

3

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Physical medicine and rehabilitation
  • Athletes
  • Physical therapy
  • MEDLINE
  • Medicine
  • Psychology
  • Applied psychology
  • Biology
No related works found for this paper.

Funding