reviewAnnual Review of Clinical PsychologyNov 13, 2004Closed access

Structural Equation Modeling: Strengths, Limitations, and Misconceptions

Vanderbilt University

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

Because structural equation modeling (SEM) has become a very popular data-analytic technique, it is important for clinical scientists to have a balanced perception of its strengths and limitations. We review several strengths of SEM, with a particular focus on recent innovations (e.g., latent growth modeling, multilevel SEM models, and approaches for dealing with missing data and with violations of normality assumptions) that underscore how SEM has become a broad data-analytic framework with flexible and unique capabilities. We also consider several limitations of SEM and some misconceptions that it tends to elicit. Major themes emphasized are the problem of omitted variables, the importance of lower-order…

Citation impact

882
total citations
FWCI
13.08
Percentile
100%
References
274
Citations per year

Authors

2

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Structural equation modeling
  • Normality
  • Strengths and weaknesses
  • Latent variable
  • Rule of thumb
  • Psychology
  • Perception
  • Management science
No related works found for this paper.