articleThe American Journal of Sports MedicineSep 1, 2002Closed access

Biomechanical Analysis of an Anatomic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

University of Pittsburgh · Greater Pittsburgh Orthopaedic Associates

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

Background

The focus of most anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions has been on replacing the anteromedial bundle and not the posterolateral bundle. HYPOTHESIS: Anatomic two-bundle reconstruction restores knee kinematics more closely to normal than does single-bundle reconstruction. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study.

Methods

Ten cadaveric knees were subjected to external loading conditions: 1) a 134-N anterior tibial load and 2) a combined rotatory load of 5-N x m internal tibial torque and 10-N x m valgus torque. Resulting knee kinematics and in situ force in the anterior cruciate ligament or replacement graft were determined by using a robotic/universal force-moment sensor testing system for 1) intact, 2) anterior cruciate ligament deficient, 3) single-bundle reconstructed, and 4) anatomically reconstructed knees.

Citation impact

984
total citations
FWCI
17.30
Percentile
100%
References
45
Citations per year

Authors

6

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Cadaveric spasm
  • Anterior cruciate ligament
  • Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
  • Valgus
  • Anatomy
  • Bundle
  • Medicine
  • Cadaver
UN Sustainable Development Goals
  • Sustainable cities and communities
No related works found for this paper.

Funding