articleInternational Journal of EpidemiologyApr 18, 2008BRONZE OA

Sensitivity of between-study heterogeneity in meta-analysis: proposed metrics and empirical evaluation

University of Ioannina · Tufts Medical Center · +1 more institution

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

Background

Several approaches are available for evaluating heterogeneity in meta-analysis. Sensitivity analyses are often used, but these are often implemented in various non-standardized ways.

Methods

We developed and implemented sequential and combinatorial algorithms that evaluate the change in between-study heterogeneity as one or more studies are excluded from the calculations. The algorithms exclude studies aiming to achieve either the maximum or the minimum final I(2) below a desired pre-set threshold. We applied these algorithms in databases of meta-analyses of binary outcome and >/=4 studies from Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (Issue 4, 2005, n = 1011) and meta-analyses of genetic associations (n = 50). Two I(2) thresholds were used (50% and 25%).

Citation impact

1,141
total citations
FWCI
11.21
Percentile
100%
References
32
Citations per year

Authors

3

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Meta-analysis
  • Statistics
  • Study heterogeneity
  • Sensitivity (control systems)
  • Mathematics
  • Systematic review
  • Medicine
  • Genetic heterogeneity
No related works found for this paper.