articleSocial PsychologyMay 1, 2014GREEN OA

Registered Reports

Center for Open Science · University of Virginia · +1 more institution

Indexed incrossref

Abstract

Ignoring replications and negative results is bad for science. This special issue presents a novel publishing format – Registered Reports – as a partial solution. Peer review occurs prior to data collection, design and analysis plans are preregistered, and results are reported regardless of outcome. Fourteen Registered Reports of replications of important published results in social psychology are reported with strong confirmatory tests. Further, the articles demonstrate open science practices such as open data, open materials, and disclosure of research process, conflicts of interest, and contributions. The credibility of published science will increase with cultural shifts that accept replications and…

Citation impact

718
total citations
FWCI
37.84
Percentile
100%
References
52
Citations per year

Authors

2

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Credibility
  • Replication (statistics)
  • Incentive
  • Publishing
  • Psychology
  • Open science
  • Publication bias
  • Social psychology
No related works found for this paper.