reviewPersonality and Social Psychology ReviewJul 22, 2006Closed access

Accuracy of Deception Judgments

Texas Christian University · University of California, Santa Barbara

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

We analyze the accuracy of deception judgments, synthesizing research results from 206 documents and 24,483 judges. In relevant studies, people attempt to discriminate lies from truths in real time with no special aids or training. In these circumstances, people achieve an average of 54% correct lie-truth judgments, correctly classifying 47% of lies as deceptive and 61% of truths as nondeceptive. Relative to cross-judge differences in accuracy, mean lie-truth discrimination abilities are nontrivial, with a mean accuracy d of roughly .40. This produces an effect that is at roughly the 60th percentile in size, relative to others that have been meta-analyzed by social psychologists. Alternative indexes of…

Citation impact

1,926
total citations
FWCI
45.16
Percentile
100%
References
51
Citations per year

Authors

2

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Deception
  • Lie detection
  • Psychology
  • Social psychology
  • Lying
  • Truth telling
UN Sustainable Development Goals
  • Reduced inequalities
No related works found for this paper.