reviewBMC PediatricsApr 20, 2013GOLD OA

A systematic review and meta-analysis to revise the Fenton growth chart for preterm infants

University of Calgary · Alberta Children's Hospital · +2 more institutions

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefdoajpubmed

Abstract

Background

The aim of this study was to revise the 2003 Fenton Preterm Growth Chart, specifically to: a) harmonize the preterm growth chart with the new World Health Organization (WHO) Growth Standard, b) smooth the data between the preterm and WHO estimates, informed by the Preterm Multicentre Growth (PreM Growth) study while maintaining data integrity from 22 to 36 and at 50 weeks, and to c) re-scale the chart x-axis to actual age (rather than completed weeks) to support growth monitoring.

Methods

Systematic review, meta-analysis, and growth chart development. We systematically searched published and unpublished literature to find population-based preterm size at birth measurement (weight, length, and/or head circumference) references, from developed countries with: Corrected gestational ages through infant assessment and/or statistical correction; Data percentiles as low as 24 weeks gestational age or lower; Sample with greater than 500 infants less than 30 weeks. Growth curves for males and females were produced using cubic splines to 50 weeks post menstrual age. LMS parameters (skew, median, and standard deviation) were calculated.

Citation impact

2,634
total citations
FWCI
70.29
Percentile
100%
References
68
Citations per year

Authors

2

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Medicine
  • Growth chart
  • Gestational age
  • Percentile
  • Birth weight
  • Pediatrics
  • Population
  • Obstetrics
UN Sustainable Development Goals
  • Partnerships for the goals
No related works found for this paper.