articleJournal of Clinical OncologyJan 29, 2005BRONZE OA

Randomized Phase III Trial of Capecitabine Compared With Bevacizumab Plus Capecitabine in Patients With Previously Treated Metastatic Breast Cancer

Rush University Medical Center · Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · +4 more institutions

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

Results

From November 2000 to March 2002, 462 patients were enrolled. Treatment arms were balanced. No significant differences were found in the incidence of diarrhea, hand-foot syndrome, thromboembolic events, or serious bleeding episodes between treatment groups. Of other grade 3 or 4 adverse events, only hypertension requiring treatment (17.9% v 0.5%) was more frequent in patients receiving bevacizumab. Combination therapy significantly increased the response rates (19.8% v 9.1%; P = .001); however, this did not result in a longer PFS (4.86 v 4.17 months; hazard ratio = 0.98). Overall survival (15.1 v 14.5 months) and time to deterioration in quality of life as measured by the Functional Assessment Of Cancer Treatment--Breast were comparable in both treatment groups.

Conclusion

Bevacizumab was well tolerated in this heavily pretreated patient population. Although the addition of bevacizumab to capecitabine produced a significant increase in response rates, this did not translate into improved PFS or overall survival.

Citation impact

1,308
total citations
FWCI
58.64
Percentile
100%
References
26
Citations per year

Authors

12

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Medicine
  • Capecitabine
  • Bevacizumab
  • Metastatic breast cancer
  • Internal medicine
  • Hazard ratio
  • Adverse effect
  • Clinical endpoint
UN Sustainable Development Goals
  • Good health and well-being
No related works found for this paper.