articleNew England Journal of MedicineOct 17, 2007Closed access

Human Papillomavirus DNA versus Papanicolaou Screening Tests for Cervical Cancer

Université de Montréal · McGill University · +6 more institutions

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

Background

To determine whether testing for DNA of oncogenic human papillomaviruses (HPV) is superior to the Papanicolaou (Pap) test for cervical-cancer screening, we conducted a randomized trial comparing the two methods.

Methods

We compared HPV testing, using an assay approved by the Food and Drug Administration, with conventional Pap testing as a screening method to identify high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in women ages 30 to 69 years in Montreal and St. John's, Canada. Women with abnormal Pap test results or a positive HPV test (at least 1 pg of high-risk HPV DNA per milliliter) underwent colposcopy and biopsy, as did a random sample of women with negative tests. Sensitivity and specificity estimates were corrected for verification bias.

Citation impact

1,106
total citations
FWCI
52.42
Percentile
100%
References
45
Citations per year

Authors

9

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Medicine
  • Colposcopy
  • Papanicolaou stain
  • Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia
  • Gynecology
  • Confidence interval
  • Pap test
  • Papanicolaou Test
UN Sustainable Development Goals
  • Good health and well-being
No related works found for this paper.