articleBMC Medical Research MethodologyJul 3, 2007GOLD OA

The Hawthorne Effect: a randomised, controlled trial

Google (United Kingdom) · Imperial College London · +2 more institutions

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefdoajpubmed

Abstract

Background

The 'Hawthorne Effect' may be an important factor affecting the generalisability of clinical research to routine practice, but has been little studied. Hawthorne Effects have been reported in previous clinical trials in dementia but to our knowledge, no attempt has been made to quantify them. Our aim was to compare minimal follow-up to intensive follow-up in participants in a placebo controlled trial of Ginkgo biloba for treating mild-moderate dementia.

Methods

Participants in a dementia trial were randomised to intensive follow-up (with comprehensive assessment visits at baseline and two, four and six months post randomisation) or minimal follow-up (with an abbreviated assessment at baseline and a full assessment at six months). Our primary outcomes were cognitive functioning (ADAS-Cog) and participant and carer-rated quality of life (QOL-AD).

Citation impact

1,709
total citations
FWCI
80.81
Percentile
100%
References
33
Citations per year

Authors

6

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Medicine
  • Quality of life (healthcare)
  • Randomized controlled trial
  • Dementia
  • Clinical trial
  • Placebo
  • Analysis of covariance
  • Physical therapy
No related works found for this paper.

Funding