reviewBMC Public HealthAug 4, 2010GOLD OA

A systematic review of evidence for the added benefits to health of exposure to natural environments

Bangor University

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefdoajpubmed

Abstract

Background

There is increasing interest in the potential role of the natural environment in human health and well-being. However, the evidence-base for specific and direct health or well-being benefits of activity within natural compared to more synthetic environments has not been systematically assessed.

Methods

We conducted a systematic review to collate and synthesise the findings of studies that compare measurements of health or well-being in natural and synthetic environments. Effect sizes of the differences between environments were calculated and meta-analysis used to synthesise data from studies measuring similar outcomes.

Citation impact

1,959
total citations
FWCI
22.57
Percentile
100%
References
57
Citations per year

Authors

4

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Meta-analysis
  • Natural (archaeology)
  • Public health
  • Natural experiment
  • Biostatistics
  • Medicine
  • Systematic review
  • Level design
UN Sustainable Development Goals
  • Life in Land
No related works found for this paper.

Funding