articleCognitive LinguisticsJul 22, 2004Closed access

Learning argument structure generalizations

AEAdele E. GoldbergDMDevin M. CasenhiserNSNitya Sethuraman
Indexed incrossrefdoaj

Abstract

General correlations between form and meaning at the level of argument structure patterns have often been assumed to be innate. Claims of in-nateness typically rest on the idea that the input is not rich enough for gen-eral learning strategies to yield the required representations. The present work demonstrates that the semantics associated with argument structure generalizations can indeed be learned, given the nature of the input and an understanding of general categorization strategies. Examination of an ex-tensive corpus study of children’s and mothers ’ speech shows that tokens of one particular verb are found to account for the lion’s share of instances of each argument frame considered. Experimental…

Citation impact

674
total citations
FWCI
13.82
Percentile
100%
References
105
Citations per year

Authors

3
  • AE
    Adele E. GoldbergCorresponding
  • DM
    Devin M. Casenhiser
  • NS
    Nitya Sethuraman

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Argument (complex analysis)
  • Linguistics
  • Psychology
  • Epistemology
  • Cognitive science
  • Sociology
  • Computer science
  • Mathematics
No related works found for this paper.