articleNew England Journal of MedicineAug 21, 2013BRONZE OA

Pazopanib versus Sunitinib in Metastatic Renal-Cell Carcinoma

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · Texas Oncology · +28 more institutions

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

Background

Pazopanib and sunitinib provided a progression-free survival benefit, as compared with placebo or interferon, in previous phase 3 studies involving patients with metastatic renal-cell carcinoma. This phase 3, randomized trial compared the efficacy and safety of pazopanib and sunitinib as first-line therapy.

Methods

We randomly assigned 1110 patients with clear-cell, metastatic renal-cell carcinoma, in a 1:1 ratio, to receive a continuous dose of pazopanib (800 mg once daily; 557 patients) or sunitinib in 6-week cycles (50 mg once daily for 4 weeks, followed by 2 weeks without treatment; 553 patients). The primary end point was progression-free survival as assessed by independent review, and the study was powered to show the noninferiority of pazopanib versus sunitinib. Secondary end points included overall survival, safety, and quality of life.

Citation impact

1,912
total citations
FWCI
128.45
Percentile
100%
References
30
Citations per year

Authors

25

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Pazopanib
  • Sunitinib
  • Medicine
  • Hazard ratio
  • Renal cell carcinoma
  • Internal medicine
  • Clinical endpoint
  • Oncology
UN Sustainable Development Goals
  • Good health and well-being
No related works found for this paper.