articleGenome biologyAug 7, 2006GOLD OA

Automatic annotation of eukaryotic genes, pseudogenes and promoters

Royal Holloway University of London

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefdoajpubmed

Abstract

Background

The ENCODE gene prediction workshop (EGASP) has been organized to evaluate how well state-of-the-art automatic gene finding methods are able to reproduce the manual and experimental gene annotation of the human genome. We have used Softberry gene finding software to predict genes, pseudogenes and promoters in 44 selected ENCODE sequences representing approximately 1% (30 Mb) of the human genome. Predictions of gene finding programs were evaluated in terms of their ability to reproduce the ENCODE-HAVANA annotation.

Results

The Fgenesh++ gene prediction pipeline can identify 91% of coding nucleotides with a specificity of 90%. Our automatic pseudogene finder (PSF program) found 90% of the manually annotated pseudogenes and some new ones. The Fprom promoter prediction program identifies 80% of TATA promoters sequences with one false positive prediction per 2,000 base-pairs (bp) and 50% of TATA-less promoters with one false positive prediction per 650 bp. It can be used to identify transcription start sites upstream of annotated coding parts of genes found by gene prediction software.

Citation impact

944
total citations
FWCI
3.68
Percentile
100%
References
26
Citations per year

Authors

4

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Pseudogene
  • ENCODE
  • Gene prediction
  • Annotation
  • Gene
  • Genome
  • Gene Annotation
  • Promoter
No related works found for this paper.