articleNew England Journal of MedicineDec 6, 2009BRONZE OA

Dabigatran versus Warfarin in the Treatment of Acute Venous Thromboembolism

Karolinska University Hospital · McMaster University Medical Centre · +8 more institutions

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

Background

The direct oral thrombin inhibitor dabigatran has a predictable anticoagulant effect and may be an alternative therapy to warfarin for patients who have acute venous thromboembolism.

Methods

In a randomized, double-blind, noninferiority trial involving patients with acute venous thromboembolism who were initially given parenteral anticoagulation therapy for a median of 9 days (interquartile range, 8 to 11), we compared oral dabigatran, administered at a dose of 150 mg twice daily, with warfarin that was dose-adjusted to achieve an international normalized ratio of 2.0 to 3.0. The primary outcome was the 6-month incidence of recurrent symptomatic, objectively confirmed venous thromboembolism and related deaths. Safety end points included bleeding events, acute coronary syndromes, other adverse events, and results of liver-function tests.

Citation impact

2,562
total citations
FWCI
93.66
Percentile
100%
References
29
Citations per year

Authors

9

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Medicine
  • Dabigatran
  • Warfarin
  • Interquartile range
  • Hazard ratio
  • Direct thrombin inhibitor
  • Confidence interval
  • Anesthesia
UN Sustainable Development Goals
  • Good health and well-being
No related works found for this paper.