Explaining Fixed Effects: Random Effects Modeling of Time-Series Cross-Sectional and Panel Data
Indexed incrossrefdoaj
Abstract
This article challenges Fixed Effects (FE) modeling as the ‘default’ for time-series-cross-sectional and panel data. Understanding different within and between effects is crucial when choosing modeling strategies. The downside of Random Effects (RE) modeling—correlated lower-level covariates and higher-level residuals—is omitted-variable bias, solvable with Mundlak's (1978a) formulation. Consequently, RE can provide everything that FE promises and more, as confirmed by Monte-Carlo simulations, which additionally show problems with Plümper and Troeger's FE Vector Decomposition method when data are unbalanced. As well as incorporating time-invariant variables, RE models are readily extendable, with random…
Citation impact
1,429
total citations
- FWCI
- 388.92
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 122
Citations per year
Authors
2Topics & keywords
Topics
Keywords
- Endogeneity
- Econometrics
- Covariate
- Multilevel model
- Monte Carlo method
- Random effects model
- Panel data
- Context (archaeology)
No related works found for this paper.