articleComparative SociologyJan 1, 2010Closed access

Standards of Good Practice in Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Fuzzy-Sets

Indexed incrossref

Abstract

Abstract As a relatively new methodological tool, QCA is still a work in progress. Standards of good practice are needed in order to enhance the quality of its applications. We present a list from A to Z of twenty-six proposals regarding what a “good” QCA-based research entails, both with regard to QCA as a research approach and as an analytical technique. Our suggestions are subdivided into three categories: criteria referring to the research stages before, during, and after the analytical moment of data analysis. This listing can be read as a guideline for authors, reviewers, and readers of QCA.

Citation impact

1,417
total citations
FWCI
87.08
Percentile
100%
References
56
Citations per year

Authors

2

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Qualitative comparative analysis
  • Computer science
  • Listing (finance)
  • Quality (philosophy)
  • Management science
  • Guideline
  • Order (exchange)
  • Fuzzy logic
No related works found for this paper.