Standards of Good Practice in Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Fuzzy-Sets
Indexed incrossref
Abstract
Abstract As a relatively new methodological tool, QCA is still a work in progress. Standards of good practice are needed in order to enhance the quality of its applications. We present a list from A to Z of twenty-six proposals regarding what a “good” QCA-based research entails, both with regard to QCA as a research approach and as an analytical technique. Our suggestions are subdivided into three categories: criteria referring to the research stages before, during, and after the analytical moment of data analysis. This listing can be read as a guideline for authors, reviewers, and readers of QCA.
Citation impact
1,417
total citations
- FWCI
- 87.08
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 56
Citations per year
Authors
2Topics & keywords
Keywords
- Qualitative comparative analysis
- Computer science
- Listing (finance)
- Quality (philosophy)
- Management science
- Guideline
- Order (exchange)
- Fuzzy logic
No related works found for this paper.