articleJournal of Personality and Social PsychologyApr 21, 2009Closed access

Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations.

University of Virginia

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

How and why do moral judgments vary across the political spectrum? To test moral foundations theory (J. Haidt & J. Graham, 2007; J. Haidt & C. Joseph, 2004), the authors developed several ways to measure people's use of 5 sets of moral intuitions: Harm/care, Fairness/reciprocity, Ingroup/loyalty, Authority/respect, and Purity/sanctity. Across 4 studies using multiple methods, liberals consistently showed greater endorsement and use of the Harm/care and Fairness/reciprocity foundations compared to the other 3 foundations, whereas conservatives endorsed and used the 5 foundations more equally. This difference was observed in abstract assessments of the moral relevance of foundation-related concerns such as…

Citation impact

4,550
total citations
FWCI
35.29
Percentile
100%
References
100
Citations per year

Authors

3

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Psychology
  • Harm
  • Loyalty
  • Social psychology
  • Ingroups and outgroups
  • Reciprocity (cultural anthropology)
  • Moral psychology
  • Foundation (evidence)
UN Sustainable Development Goals
  • Peace, Justice and strong institutions
No related works found for this paper.

Funding