articleAnnals of the Rheumatic DiseasesMay 18, 2013HYBRID OA

A randomised, double-blind, parallel-group study to demonstrate equivalence in efficacy and safety of CT-P13 compared with innovator infliximab when coadministered with methotrexate in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: the PLANETRA study

Hanyang University Seoul Hospital · Poznan University of Medical Sciences · +13 more institutions

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

Objectives

To compare the efficacy and safety of innovator infliximab (INX) and CT-P13, an INX biosimilar, in active rheumatoid arthritis patients with inadequate response to methotrexate (MTX) treatment.

Methods

Phase III randomised, double-blind, multicentre, multinational, parallel-group study. Patients with active disease despite MTX (12.5-25 mg/week) were randomised to receive 3 mg/kg of CT-P13 (n=302) or INX (n=304) with MTX and folic acid. The primary endpoint was the American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) response at week 30. Therapeutic equivalence of clinical response according to ACR20 criteria was concluded if the 95% CI for the treatment difference was within ±15%. Secondary endpoints included ACR response criteria, European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) response criteria, change in Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28), Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36), Simplified Disease Activity Index, Clinical Disease Activity Index, as well as pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) parameters, safety and immunogenicity.

Citation impact

653
total citations
FWCI
32.68
Percentile
100%
References
19
Citations per year

Authors

18

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Medicine
  • Rheumatoid arthritis
  • Internal medicine
  • Rheumatism
  • Clinical endpoint
  • Rheumatology
  • Methotrexate
  • Adverse effect
No related works found for this paper.

Funding