articleJNCI Journal of the National Cancer InstituteJun 17, 2003BRONZE OA

Lead Times and Overdetection Due to Prostate-Specific Antigen Screening: Estimates From the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer

Erasmus MC

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

Background

Screening for prostate cancer advances the time of diagnosis (lead time) and detects cancers that would not have been diagnosed in the absence of screening (overdetection). Both consequences have considerable impact on the net benefits of screening.

Methods

We developed simulation models based on results of the Rotterdam section of the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC), which enrolled 42,376 men and in which 1498 cases of prostate cancer were identified, and on baseline prostate cancer incidence and stage distribution data. The models were used to predict mean lead times, overdetection rates, and ranges (corresponding to approximate 95% confidence intervals) associated with different screening programs.

Citation impact

1,075
total citations
FWCI
41.65
Percentile
100%
References
38
Citations per year

Authors

7

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Medicine
  • Prostate cancer
  • Prostate cancer screening
  • Confidence interval
  • Prostate
  • Relative risk
  • Cancer
  • Prostate-specific antigen
UN Sustainable Development Goals
  • Good health and well-being
No related works found for this paper.